hippyroo Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 dood, it's "Pi" not "phi" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Phi is not pi ! check this out! https://goldennumber.net/neophite.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fledgling666 Posted March 14, 2005 Share Posted March 14, 2005 ah, gotcha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 <font color='#000000'>Sounds like a bunch of wackos to me.</font> <{POST_SNAPBACK}> agreed, wackos, flawed methods and questionable double blind experiments... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 its not a true random number. the algorythm would have to be based on an existing solvable mathematical problem, or derivitive thereof, and hence would be predictable. this is one of the primary problems with encryption. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> what happens if you reverse the polarity? it always worked for "scotty" on star trek??:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walkabout Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 what happens if you reverse the polarity? it always worked for "scotty" on star trek??:) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> and did you ever notice no matter how many times someone said 'Beam me up Scotty' no one said please or thank you!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.63d07fcd002dbf674890093c0d952955.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now