Guest Starchild Posted January 29, 2005 Share Posted January 29, 2005 Hi, this is my first post. I'm UK based and love this show and love the fact that it completely messes with your head!!! One question that I'd love answered is this. In the episode 'The Hand Of San Sebastian', Cheryl Andrews is basically working for the 'other' side. However in the episode 'Skull And Bones' Frank is concerned about the murder of Cheryl Andrews, yet in 'The Hand Of San Sebastian' she is the bad one. Please help me out on this one. SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walkabout Posted January 29, 2005 Share Posted January 29, 2005 As I understood it she was of the 'Owl' faction where Peter Watts was of the 'Rooster' faction .. each faction was interested in Frank and his ablilitys but since he had not commited to either he was not totally trusted by either side.. BTW.. welcome to a great site.. I am somewhat new here too but you will find it a great place to hang out, have fun and get lots of answers!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Wolf Posted January 30, 2005 Share Posted January 30, 2005 Welcome Starchild! Hope to see you here often! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Paul Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 CCH Pounder's character did almost the same thing in End of Days with Scwarzeneggar. The betrayal scenes were very similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MMawagen Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 Yeah, it was a poorly done transition from S2 to S3 in the case of Andrews. What she did was far worse than just an intraservice rivalry (really unforgivable murder and betrayal) yet in S3 those things seem to be either forgotten or minimalized to such a degree that you just have to throw up your hands and admit they really blew it there. We can attempt to rationalize it here (and I've seen many try on other boards) but I've never seen it done to anything approaching a satifactory explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hippyroo Posted February 2, 2005 Share Posted February 2, 2005 it is difficult to look at all three seasons as one complet canon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hale Posted February 15, 2005 Share Posted February 15, 2005 You can definitely tell when different writers were working on different episodes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AJCrowley Posted February 21, 2005 Share Posted February 21, 2005 Actually, was she working for oen of the factions in "Hand" ? i got the impression she was actually operating as part of another group, the church maybe ? no evidence to back this up, just the vibe i got... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxx Blackwell Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 FRANK: You won't solve this case looking for a reason, Agent Hollis. HOLLIS: Everyone has a reason. FRANK: What's yours? OK. How do you pronounce CCH Pounder's first name? Or is it initials all combined? As for what happened I'm trying to wrap my mind around that one too. I don't think we can actually rationalize what appears to be a conflict between season 2 and season 3 with Cheryl Andrews. I will give it an attempt after I review the episode once again but would like to hear theories too. But surely it can't be a continuity mistake. Someone who worked on Season 2 would have pointed out the incongruity before working on the episode for Season 3. If they deliberately went ahead with it this means there is a rationalization or they're making a statement - it never really happened. Cheers, Maxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4th Horseman Posted October 17, 2005 Share Posted October 17, 2005 FRANK: You won't solve this case looking for a reason, Agent Hollis. HOLLIS: Everyone has a reason. FRANK: What's yours? OK. How do you pronounce CCH Pounder's first name? Or is it initials all combined? As for what happened I'm trying to wrap my mind around that one too. I don't think we can actually rationalize what appears to be a conflict between season 2 and season 3 with Cheryl Andrews. I will give it an attempt after I review the episode once again but would like to hear theories too. But surely it can't be a continuity mistake. Someone who worked on Season 2 would have pointed out the incongruity before working on the episode for Season 3. If they deliberately went ahead with it this means there is a rationalization or they're making a statement - it never really happened. Cheers, Maxx Walkabout, you crack me up..."I am fairly new here also". With over 900 posts? LOL... To me the enigma that is Cheryl Andrews is a moot point, as well as her percieved alliance with either Owls or Roosters. She was arrested in "The Hand of St. Sebastian" and deported and killed in "Skull and Bones" after being considered one of 43 threats, the time between events not really being defined. My question is "what kind of a threat did she pose, and just how did her finding a mutation two weeks after the so-called radio installation went on line in Alaska have any relevance to her death? Why was that never explained? Anyway, I've never found her character to be of much interest anyway, more of an annoyance, tolerable for me at least only in "Force Majure". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.63d07fcd002dbf674890093c0d952955.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now