Jump to content

Star Trek's Replicators


Recommended Posts

  • Elders (Admins)

Here's a couple of questions for you Sci-Fi Buffs...

Having always been impressed with the idea Star Trek: Next Generation Food & Drink Replicators, I wondered how far off do you think we are to inventing something like this that would be safe and easily available?

Do you think such a device capable of ending famine and starvation would be made available if it were invented? Many large corporations if not governments might fall in the same way as if a water powered car were invented. My conspiracy theory meter is going off the scale here.

What do you think?

  • Thank you for not contributing to the spread of fake or inaccurate content, speculation or false information especially in relation to current worldwide health events.
  • Need help? For technical related issues, please use our Support Forum.
  • To report spam or inappropriate content, please use the Report option which flags all community Elders and autohides the content if multiple reports are received before site staff can respond directly.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Wellington

Hi

I would not bet anything on it being created at all! I guess it would be the summum of engineering: picking up particles at an atomic or subatomic level, beaming them, combining them in a perfect structure and then leaving the result stable... Quite a few headaches for any scientist!

I have read something interesting some time ago, about teleportation of matter. According to ST technical guides, the technology would be quite similar: decomposing a structure first, then beaming the particles and last re-combining them. It would show some mastercraft, no doubt. In the report, there was no sign of any breakthrough in that way. However, the principles were clear and understandable (I just have memory leaks about it). If we take the steps of the process one by one, none is about to be experimented in a lab.

Decombining and recombining molecules is not really hard game at only molecular scale (in some cases only), but I suppose it would need a great amount of energy for even tiny volumes. Then there is a need to store the particles with some kind of classification.

The beaming step (teleportation) is the most fanciable, but may not be allowed in our knowledge of physics. Basically, we cannot even beam energy from one point to another. It would be a good starting point because it would involve basic particles like electrons.

The recombination part... How could we make it? Great differences between, say, some water and a steak and fries. However the basic material would be the same. You just need to get the right sketches to put everything at the right location. I cannot understand how to do it for a 8 oz piece of beef in less than centuries! That is with today's technology. Let us see it at the root: the means of observing atomic-sized things are not really convenient: the presence of atoms is extracted from a side effect of a better-know physical interaction, and then given artificial representation. The samples must be tiny and stay passive. There is no way one can directly play with atoms, for there is no comfortable ways of looking at them! However one can create particles from different ones. But then you need the use of a collider several kilometers in diameter, huge magnetic propellers dispatched on its perimeter, and atomic samples for the tests. Result: a probabilistic high-energy collision leaving some combination of the base material. Really far from the steack and not a lounge-size apparel! It would also mean the end of an old myth, for lead could really turn into gold!

A better solution to end stravation is to decide to give assistance to create fertile fields and then plant seeds. There are so many ways to irigate, to harvest quickly and efficiently. Some of this methods are purely theoretical but would deserve a chance to be implemented. Then maybe well-fed people could create those replicators!  :;): What lacks is maybe only the will to do it. Maybe the assistance given to these country is not the right one, the greatest priority. Butthat would create business, no doubt about it!

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

If the world is run by corporations, they want healthy, happy consumers; if they are making money on a replicator they'll let us have it.

If the world is run by egalitarians, they want everyone to be equal even if it means lowering everyone's standard of living, so you wont' get a replicator until everyone can have one (unless you are one of the leaders of course), which means you won't get one until about 200 years after it was invented.

If the world is run by the Illumibatti, then you'll only get one when you go through the secret membership rituals.

If the world is run by the reptilian aliens then you only get one if it fattens you up quicker, or makes you taste better.

If the world is run by demons, they'll let you have one only because the food tastes like crap and is bad for you.

If the world is run by God then he already has a storehouse of manna that he might give you instead.

"What you do when you think no one is looking is who you are."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't it just and who would have thought that Simon Pegg, English comedian for those not in the know, would one day contribute to one of the most powerful franchises there is. "Beam me up Scotty" - yeah, I know that was never said but it felt good all the same.

Live long and prosper,

Eth

josew.gif

style5,Little-spc-Roedecker.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

todays SciFi fantasy is tomorrows science fact. We are only limited by our imaginations :wiggle: when Flash Gordon came out in the early thirties it was all concidered fantasy including space flight and laser beams

you can pick your friends... you can pick your nose .... but you can NEVER pick your friend's nose !!

MAKE EVERY DAY COUNT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Similar Content

    • By Raven Wolf
      Updated: 01:25 PM EDT
      'Star Trek' Star James Doohan Dies
      By BOB THOMAS, AP


      Getty ImagesJames Doohan will always be known for his role of Scotty on 'Star Trek.'

      Jump Below:
      · Remembering Scotty

      More Coverage:
      · Read Doohan's Filmography

      Hear Scotty in 'Star Trek':
      'It Won't Hold for Long'
      'Please Respond'

      More News Conversations:


      Talk About It: Post Thoughts

      LOS ANGELES (July 20) - James Doohan, the burly chief engineer of the Starship Enterprise in the original "Star Trek" TV series and motion pictures who responded to the command "Beam me up, Scotty," died early Wednesday. He was 85.

      Doohan died at 5:30 a.m. at his Redmond, Wash., home with his wife of 28 years, Wende, at his side, Los Angeles agent and longtime friend Steve Stevens said. The cause of death was pneumonia and Alzheimer's disease, he said.

      The Canadian-born Doohan was enjoying a busy career as a character actor when he auditioned for a role as an engineer in a new space adventure on NBC in 1966. A master of dialects from his early years in radio, he tried seven different accents.

      "The producers asked me which one I preferred," Doohan recalled 30 years later. "I believed the Scot voice was the most commanding. So I told them, 'If this character is going to be an engineer, you'd better make him a Scotsman."'

      The series, which starred William Shatner as Capt. James T. Kirk and Leonard Nimoy as the enigmatic Mr. Spock, attracted an enthusiastic following of science fiction fans, especially among teenagers and children, but not enough ratings power. NBC canceled it after three seasons.

      When the series ended in 1969, Doohan found himself typecast as Montgomery Scott, the canny engineer with a burr in his voice. In 1973, he complained to his dentist, who advised him: "Jimmy, you're going to be Scotty long after you're dead. If I were you, I'd go with the flow."

      "I took his advice," said Doohan, "and since then everything's been just lovely."

      "Star Trek" continued in syndicated TV both in the United States and abroad, and its following grew larger and more dedicated. In his later years, Doohan attended 40 "Trekkie" gatherings around the country and lectured at colleges.

      The huge success of George Lucas's "Star Wars" in 1977 prompted Paramount Pictures, which had produced "Star Trek" for TV, to plan a movie based on the series. The studio brought back the TV cast and hired a topflight director, Robert Wise. "Star Trek - The Motion Picture" was successful enough to spawn five sequels.

      The powerfully built Doohan, a veteran of D-Day in Normandy, spoke frankly in 1998 about his employer, Paramount, and his TV commander:

      "I started out in the series at basic minimum- plus 10 percent for my agent. That was added a little bit in the second year. When we finally got to our third year, Paramount told us we'd get second-year pay! That's how much they loved us."


      Scotty Remembered




      He accused Shatner of hogging the camera, adding: "I like Captain Kirk, but I sure don't like Bill. He's so insecure that all he can think about is himself."

      James Montgomery Doohan was born March 3, 1920, in Vancouver, B.C., youngest of four children of William Doohan, a pharmacist, veterinarian and dentist, and his wife Sarah. As he wrote in his autobiography, "Beam Me Up, Scotty," his father was a drunk who made life miserable for his wife and children.

      At 19, James escaped the turmoil at home by joining the Canadian army, becoming a lieutenant in artillery. He was among the Canadian forces that landed on Juno Beach on D-Day. "The sea was rough," he recalled. "We were more afraid of drowning than the Germans."

      The Canadians crossed a minefield laid for tanks; the soldiers weren't heavy enough to detonate the bombs. At 11:30 that night, he was machine-gunned, taking six hits: one that took off his middle right finger (he managed to hide the missing finger on the screen), four in his leg and one in the chest. Fortunately the chest bullet was stopped by his silver cigarette case.

      After the war Doohan on a whim enrolled in a drama class in Toronto. He showed promise and won a two-year scholarship to New York's famed Neighborhood Playhouse, where fellow students included Leslie Nielsen, Tony Randall and Richard Boone.

      His commanding presence and booming voice brought him work as a character actor in films and television, both in Canada and the U.S. Oddly, his only other TV series besides "Star Trek" was another space adventure, "Space Command," in 1953.

      Doohan's first marriage to Judy Doohan produced four children. He had two children by his second marriage to Anita Yagel. Both marriages ended in divorce. In 1974 he married Wende Braunberger, and their children were Eric, Thomas and Sarah, who was born in 2000, when Doohan was 80.

      In a 1998 interview, Doohan was asked if he ever got tired of hearing the line "Beam me up, Scotty."

      "I'm not tired of it at all," he replied. "Good gracious, it's been said to me for just about 31 years. It's been said to me at 70 miles an hour across four lanes on the freeway. I hear it from just about everybody. It's been fun."

      Funeral arrangements were incomplete.


      07/20/05 11:54 EDT

      Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.


      Article from AOL news
    • Guest Regan MacNeil
      By Guest Regan MacNeil
      I was just wondering if anyone here bought the ST: Generations SE and if so, were there any trailers included? It was supposed to be released on the 7th but they recalled it because they forgot to include the trailers, but I just bought the new release and I still can't find them. Are they hidden, did Paramound screw up AGAIN, or did my local Wal-Mart display the wrong version?
    • Guest Sidewinder
      By Guest Sidewinder
      Off course I would. I'll do whatever I can to keep you informed about the event but without a question it would be very cool to meet some of you there. At least from the UK it's not that far. I was on a convention in Birmingham 2003, great experience.

      Regarding "Voy"; I was a little bit disappointed that they gave up their plotline very fast. The Marquis and the federation were friends after… I don't know, perhaps seven episodes? And they had resources (Shuttles, torpedo…) nearly without restrictions.
      That list could go on for a while but you get the picture. "SG: Universe" is doing better in some ways. Nevertheless "Voyager" had some great stories too. I loved species 3471, the Borg-episodes, Holo-Doc and… No, I won't mention the catsuit.

      Sorry for being off topic. Somewhere inside me is an old "Star Trek" fan who hadn't the chance to talk about ST for a long time...


    • By Beerbelch
      BEER----> Snuck out of the office yesterday to go see the new one. I enjoyed it very much and left asking if I could come back next week for another episode. Nimoy had quite a bit of screen time and that worked out good too.

      Anybody else see it yet.
      BELCH
    • By Gotham Gal
      Star Trek Picard is two episodes in on CBS All Access. I'd recommend it if you like sci-fi and have at least a passing interest in Star Trek incarnations.  It's been set up very skillfully for a potentially intriguing story re: Romulans, Data, Borg, and of course, Picard, now retired (not really). I like it better than Discovery, which I couldn't (or at least haven't) finished. On a positive note, it's been renewed for next season, so no worries about cancellation at least for a year or so.
  • 10 Recent Topics

  • 942E75C2-F0CE-46E3-9CDC-D8C2F067DCDF.png

    Our new Spreadshirt clothing and apparel stores are now available!

    US/CAN UK/EU

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines