Guest Xircuits Posted August 25, 2004 Share Posted August 25, 2004 <font color='#000000'>I was reading some posts on someone talking about ALIAS when I found a link to something called the 47 Society. https://www.47.net/47society/47story/ Be Seeing You, David Blackwell</font> Incidentally, the colours for the 47 group are the same as the colours used for the New York Subway. The #4 train is green...and runs by my university. While the #7 train is purple/violet and runs right into Queens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Seraphim Posted August 26, 2004 Share Posted August 26, 2004 1: The language of nature is mathematics. 2: Everything can be represented and understood through numbers. 3: If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are pattern everywhere in nature For those who get this reference, I just couldn't resist XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest exegesis Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 there is no true way to generate a random number. so certain numbers are going to appear in any man made random number generator far more than others. we see randoms where we want to, numbers of stars, planets, species of insects, populations, etc. but they only exist as random coincidenses because we put limits on them to constrain them. we stop counting when it makes sense. Order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walkabout Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 there is no true way to generate a random number. so certain numbers are going to appear in any man made random number generator far more than others. we see randoms where we want to, numbers of stars, planets, species of insects, populations, etc. but they only exist as random coincidenses because we put limits on them to constrain them. we stop counting when it makes sense. Order. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Don't tell the government that .. they spent big bucks to have some computer geek create a random number program for us to use on the job. It would hurt their feelings [geek was not in spell check ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SouthernCelt Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 Since "Professor Bentley" of Pomona College proved that all numbers are equal and that one equality is 47 then you don't need a random number generator. "Round and round she goes, where she stops nobody knows...why, the lucky number is 47! Every time!" I think "Professor Bentley" might have been doing a little research on the side with some of those mind-altering chemicals that the DOD and CIA were soooo interested in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gravity well Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 I think "Professor Bentley" might have been doing a little research on the side with some of those mind-altering chemicals that the DOD and CIA were soooo interested in... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Er, what do you mean were? https://society.guardian.co.uk/drugsandalco...1416150,00.html Combat stress my ass, they just wanna party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fledgling666 Posted March 8, 2005 Share Posted March 8, 2005 1: The language of nature is mathematics. 2: Everything can be represented and understood through numbers. 3: If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are pattern everywhere in nature For those who get this reference, I just couldn't resist XD <{POST_SNAPBACK}> uh, yeah......... sol: As soon as you discard scientific rigor, you're no longer a mathematician, you're a numerologist. -pi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hippyroo Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 phi oh phi can't they see the the pattern? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest exegesis Posted March 9, 2005 Share Posted March 9, 2005 Don't tell the government that .. they spent big bucks to have some computer geek create a random number program for us to use on the job. It would hurt their feelings [geek was not in spell check ] <{POST_SNAPBACK}> its not a true random number. the algorythm would have to be based on an existing solvable mathematical problem, or derivitive thereof, and hence would be predictable. this is one of the primary problems with encryption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fledgling666 Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 phi oh phi can't they see the the pattern? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> dood, it's "Pi" not "phi" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now